If @cosmos can mirror the same clear "usage ->revenue -> token buybacks” loop as @zksync, with concrete revenue routing and updated tokenomics, $ATOM and $ATOM holders can benefit from enterprise-stack adoption in a similarly programmatic way.
What @zksync is doing:
🔸Fees from native interoperability + enterprise licensing would flow into a governance-controlled mechanism that buys $ZK, then allocates to burns, staking rewards, and ecosystem funding (proposal; needs approval).
How this maps to $ATOM:
🔸Cosmos Stack revenue (e.g., IBC/bridge/routing fees, shared modules, support/SLAs) could be directed to $ATOM via buybacks or fee-shares, similar to ZK’s model.
Big Prereqs though:
🔸Formal governance to route off-/on-chain revenues to $ATOM, and tokenomics reform so issuance doesn’t dilute the impact.
Source:
$ATOM ⚛️
🫡
6,824
73
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明，OKX 不是所引用文章的作者，也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考，並不代表 OKX 觀點，不作為任何形式的認可，也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下，此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章，瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險，其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況，仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。