Memecoin price

🆚 How is the Uniswap LP UI/UX experience? 1️⃣ Timeline The day before yesterday (10.24), I added PING/ETH LP on Uniswap, and the experience was frustrating to the point of collapse. Yesterday (10.25), Uniswap released a new version of the LP UI. I tweeted my complaints, and the Uniswap team replied, revealing that the new version was completed back in August and only went live yesterday. Regardless, the new UI experience has indeed improved. That's a good thing. 2️⃣ The biggest problem with the original version Why do I say the original UI was frustrating? The core issue lies in selecting the price range, especially for MEME coins. When you can only manually click the plus and minus buttons to choose different price ranges (for concentrated liquidity market making), I believe many people would feel lost and have no idea how to set specific values. You might not even know which should be larger, Min Price or Max Price. Every time a new coin is launched, there are always people who get the price range wrong and are violently arbitraged by bots. I believe the poor UI of the original version bears some responsibility for that. 3️⃣ The biggest improvement in the new version Four different "price strategies" have been preset. Users won't be at a loss; they can simply click the "Wide" strategy and immediately get a calculated price range. Then you can make slight adjustments based on that. With a reference, it naturally feels more certain. 4️⃣ What else is lacking 1. The Current Price chart is hard to understand Putting current liquidity, price trends, and price range indicators in one chart is too cluttered. 2. The four options for Price strategies are not intuitive In simple terms, these four strategies are divided into two categories: A. Different price ranges B. One-sided liquidity However, you need to put in a lot of effort to understand what these four options specifically mean and under what circumstances you should choose the corresponding strategy. 3. Price-driven rather than percentage-driven This is the biggest issue. Price-driven means that the default display shows specific Min Price and Max Price (e.g., 40932 ~ 120501), while percentage-driven is something like -45% ~ +61%. Believe me, unless you are market making for assets like ETH or WBTC that you are very familiar with in terms of daily prices, if you are given a MEME coin, whether it shows 40,000 or 400,000, you won't have any concept of what that price means. Easter egg: To write this content, I just tested and found out that you can switch the percentage value by clicking the number below Price, allowing you to directly modify the percentage value. In contrast, Meteora has always prioritized percentages; you don't need to know the current price at all. After all, isn't the essence of concentrated liquidity to market make within a certain percentage range around the current price? 4. What else is missing If you've used Meteora DLMM, you'll rave about their three major strategies: Spot, Curve, Bid-Ask. These three different strategies represent three completely different ways to deploy liquidity. DLMM allows you to deploy non-equal amounts of liquidity at different price bins/ticks. But the four Price Strategies provided by Uniswap actually correspond to DLMM's Spot strategy, which is a flat liquidity approach. 5️⃣ What is the gap between Uniswap and Meteora If I say that the LP market making experience on Uniswap is still ten Pancake Swaps away from Meteora, LP users probably won't disagree. I think the core issue is: Uniswap focuses on ordinary trading users, while Meteora puts all its emphasis on LP market making users. The Uniswap team designs products from an engineering perspective, from UI and terminology to actual user experience, very Microsoft-like; Meteora, on the other hand, is more Apple-like, designing products from the perspective of actual (LP) users, hiding technical details, and prioritizing user needs and experience. So I say that the engineers/product managers responsible for the LP page at Uniswap probably don't add liquidity themselves, and the products they create naturally deviate from the actual needs of ordinary users. Beautiful, but useless. 6️⃣ The advantages of Uniswap The advantages being mentioned last is not because I'm biased, but rather because it's the part that amazed me. The day before yesterday, I tweeted just to vent, and I didn't even @ their Uniswap official account because in my impression, how could such a large project have the time to interact with you, let alone make changes? Not to mention that you are speaking Chinese. But someone from Uniswap actually came to reply. Thinking about how many posts I've made, how many strategies I've written, in both Chinese and English, but the Meteora official account has never replied even once, not even a like. Not once. Uniswap did a great job! Wait, could it be that Uniswap Labs is too financially robust, hiring too many people, so that random Chinese complaints on Twitter are "just right" to be seen? In any case, I hope Uniswap continues to improve. That's all. P.S. Sorry for the Chinese, guys. @plondon514 @xin__wan